{"id":9491,"date":"2018-11-22T23:15:50","date_gmt":"2018-11-22T20:15:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=9491"},"modified":"2018-11-22T23:15:50","modified_gmt":"2018-11-22T20:15:50","slug":"lat-kreditoriai-neturi-teises-reikalauti-kad-ipediniai-prieme-palikima-pagal-apyrasa-patenkintu-ju-reikalavimus-ne-is-paveldeto-turto-o-is-ipedinio-asmeninio-turto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2018\/11\/22\/lat-kreditoriai-neturi-teises-reikalauti-kad-ipediniai-prieme-palikima-pagal-apyrasa-patenkintu-ju-reikalavimus-ne-is-paveldeto-turto-o-is-ipedinio-asmeninio-turto\/","title":{"rendered":"LAT: kreditoriai neturi teis\u0117s reikalauti, kad \u012fp\u0117diniai, pri\u0117m\u0119 palikim\u0105 pagal apyra\u0161\u0105, patenkint\u0173 j\u0173 reikalavimus ne i\u0161 paveld\u0117to turto, o i\u0161 \u012fp\u0117dinio asmeninio turto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Civilin\u0117je byloje (Nr.\u00a0e3K-7-315-915\/2018) buvo sprend\u017eiamas klausimas, ar palikim\u0105 pagal apyra\u0161\u0105 pri\u0117musio \u012fp\u0117dinio atsakomyb\u0117 ribojama paveld\u0117tu turtu ar paveld\u0117to turto verte. Antstol\u0117 buvo sudariusi paveldimo turto apyra\u0161\u0105, pagal kur\u012f paveld\u0117to turto vert\u0117 buvo daugiau nei 12 t\u016bkst. Eur. Iki palikimo atsiradimo palik\u0117jas tur\u0117jo didesn\u0119 skol\u0105. I\u0161 palikim\u0105 pri\u0117musios \u012fp\u0117din\u0117s \u2013 jo \u017emonos Valstybin\u0117 mokes\u010di\u0173 inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finans\u0173 ministerijos (VMI) pra\u0161\u0117 sumok\u0117ti susidariusi\u0105 nepriemok\u0105 \u2013 daugiau nei 78 t\u016bkst. Eur, ta\u010diau \u012fp\u0117din\u0117 atsisak\u0117 tai padaryti. \u012ep\u0117din\u0117 siek\u0117 sumok\u0117ti kreditorei tik turto apyra\u0161e nurodyt\u0105 12 t\u016bkst. eur\u0173 atitinkan\u010di\u0105 paveld\u0117to turto vert\u0119, tuo tarpu VMI su tuo nesutiko ir nurod\u0117, kad, realizavus paveld\u0117t\u0105 turt\u0105, gal\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti gauta didesn\u0117 suma, i\u0161 kurios didesne apimtimi gal\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti patenkintas VMI reikalavimas.<\/p>\n<p>Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiasis Teismas (LAT) nurod\u0117, kad kai palikim\u0105 pri\u0117musiems \u012fp\u0117diniams yra pareik\u0161ti kreditori\u0173 piniginiai reikalavimai, tokie reikalavimai paprastai yra tenkinami pinigine forma. Atsi\u017evelgdama \u012f tai, kad \u012fstatyme ne\u012ftvirtinta pareiga realizuoti paveld\u0117t\u0105 turt\u0105, taip pat n\u0117ra nustatyta speciali\u0173 atsiskaitymo su palik\u0117jo kreditoriais bei paveld\u0117to turto realizavimo taisykli\u0173, i\u0161pl\u0117stin\u0117 teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija i\u0161ai\u0161kino, kad \u012fstatymo formuluot\u0117 \u201eu\u017e palik\u0117jo skolas atsako tik paveld\u0117tu turtu\u201c rei\u0161kia tai, kad kreditoriai neturi teis\u0117s reikalauti, kad \u012fp\u0117diniai, pri\u0117m\u0119 palikim\u0105 pagal apyra\u0161\u0105, patenkint\u0173 j\u0173 reikalavimus didesne apimtimi, negu yra vertas paveld\u0117tas turtas. Kai \u012fp\u0117dinis siekia i\u0161saugoti paveld\u0117t\u0105 turt\u0105 ir pageidauja kreditori\u0173 reikalavimus tenkinti i\u0161 kit\u0173 l\u0117\u0161\u0173, tokia \u012fp\u0117dinio teis\u0117 netur\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti ribojama su s\u0105lyga, kad yra u\u017etikrinama kreditoriaus teis\u0117 gauti reikalavimo patenkinim\u0105 tokia apimtimi, kokia yra paveld\u0117to turto vert\u0117. Tokiu atveju esmin\u0119 reik\u0161m\u0119 \u012fgyja tikrosios paveld\u0117to turto vert\u0117s nustatymas.<\/p>\n<p>Pasisakydamas d\u0117l paveld\u0117to turto vert\u0117s nustatymo LAT atkreip\u0117 d\u0117mes\u012f, kad kai tarp palik\u0117jo kreditori\u0173 ir \u012fp\u0117dinio nekyla gin\u010do d\u0117l paveld\u0117to turto vert\u0117s, \u012fp\u0117dinis gali i\u0161vengti i\u0161ie\u0161kojimo nukreipimo \u012f paveld\u0117t\u0105 turt\u0105, sumok\u0117damas kreditoriams \u0161ali\u0173 susitarimu nustatyt\u0105 paveldimo turto tikr\u0105j\u0105 vert\u0119 atitinkan\u010di\u0105 sum\u0105. Jei vis d\u0117lto \u0161alys d\u0117l paveld\u0117to turto vert\u0117s nesutaria, i\u0161ie\u0161kojimas vykdymo procese gali b\u016bti nukreipiamas \u012f paveld\u0117t\u0105 turt\u0105. Tok\u012f turt\u0105 \u012fkainoja antstolis, prireikus gali b\u016bti pasitelkiami ekspertai. Jeigu iki var\u017eytyni\u0173 paskelbimo \u012f antstolio depozitin\u0119 s\u0105skait\u0105 sumokama ne ma\u017eesn\u0117 pinig\u0173 suma kaip turto are\u0161to akte nurodyta are\u0161tuoto turto vert\u0117 arba ma\u017eesn\u0117 suma, kurios u\u017etenka \u012fsiskolinimams ir vykdymo i\u0161laidoms visi\u0161kai padengti, turto pardavimas i\u0161 var\u017eytyni\u0173 nevykdomas. \u0160i norma sudaro teisin\u012f pagrind\u0105 \u012fp\u0117diniui i\u0161vengti paveld\u0117to turto realizavimo ir i\u0161saugoti paveld\u0117t\u0105 turt\u0105, sumokant turto are\u0161to akte nurodyt\u0105 sum\u0105.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiojo Teismo informacija<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Civilin\u0117je byloje (Nr.\u00a0e3K-7-315-915\/2018) buvo sprend\u017eiamas klausimas, ar palikim\u0105 pagal apyra\u0161\u0105 pri\u0117musio \u012fp\u0117dinio atsakomyb\u0117 ribojama paveld\u0117tu turtu ar paveld\u0117to turto verte. Antstol\u0117 buvo sudariusi paveldimo turto apyra\u0161\u0105, pagal kur\u012f paveld\u0117to turto vert\u0117 buvo daugiau nei 12 t\u016bkst. Eur. Iki palikimo atsiradimo palik\u0117jas tur\u0117jo didesn\u0119 skol\u0105. I\u0161 palikim\u0105 pri\u0117musios \u012fp\u0117din\u0117s \u2013 jo \u017emonos Valstybin\u0117 mokes\u010di\u0173 inspekcija prie &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":9492,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[1143,1141,1142,97,718,487],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9491"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9491"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9491\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9493,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9491\/revisions\/9493"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}