{"id":7368,"date":"2018-09-27T22:02:35","date_gmt":"2018-09-27T19:02:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=7368"},"modified":"2018-09-27T22:02:35","modified_gmt":"2018-09-27T19:02:35","slug":"lvat-sprendimu-buves-nacionalines-mokejimo-agenturos-vadovas-grazintas-i-pareigas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2018\/09\/27\/lvat-sprendimu-buves-nacionalines-mokejimo-agenturos-vadovas-grazintas-i-pareigas\/","title":{"rendered":"LVAT sprendimu buv\u0119s Nacionalin\u0117s mok\u0117jimo agent\u016bros vadovas gr\u0105\u017eintas \u012f pareigas"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (LVAT) 2018 m. rugs\u0117jo 26 d. sprendimu patenkino parei\u0161k\u0117jo apeliacin\u012f skund\u0105, panaikindamas Lietuvos Respublikos \u017eem\u0117s \u016bkio ministro 2018 m. sausio 17 d. \u012fsakym\u0105 bei gr\u0105\u017eindamas parei\u0161k\u0117j\u0105 \u012f buvusias Nacionalin\u0117s mok\u0117jimo agent\u016bros direktoriaus pareigas, priteisiant \u0161iam i\u0161 atsakovo 22\u00a0268,57 Eur vidutin\u012f darbo u\u017emokest\u012f u\u017e priverstin\u0117s pravaik\u0161tos laik\u0105 nuo 2018 m. sausio 18 d. iki 2018 m. rugs\u0117jo 26 d.<\/p>\n<p>LVAT teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija sprendime pa\u017eym\u0117jo, jog atleid\u017eiant parei\u0161k\u0117j\u0105 i\u0161 Nacionalin\u0117s mok\u0117jimo agent\u016bros direktoriaus pareig\u0173, buvo netinkamai taikytas atleidimo pagrindas. Teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija nurod\u0117, jog atsakovas skund\u017eiamame \u012fsakyme parei\u0161k\u0117jo atleidimo pagrindu nurod\u0117 Valstyb\u0117s tarnybos \u012fstatymo (toliau \u2013 VT\u012e) 44 straipsnio 1 dalies 20 punkt\u0105, numatant\u012f, jog valstyb\u0117s tarnautojas atleid\u017eiamas i\u0161 pareig\u0173, kai valstyb\u0117s tarnautoj\u0105 \u012f pareigas pri\u0117m\u0119s asmuo nevykdo \u0161io \u012estatymo 31 straipsnio 2 ir 3 dalyse nustatyt\u0173 pareig\u0173. Ta\u010diau \u012fvertinusi teis\u0117s akt\u0173 reikalavimus, teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija pabr\u0117\u017e\u0117, kad VT\u012e 44 straipsnio 1 dalies 20 punktas taikytinas tik tais atvejais, kai valstyb\u0117s tarnautoj\u0105, siekiant\u012f eiti pareigas valstyb\u0117s ar savivaldyb\u0117s \u012fstaigoje ar \u012fmon\u0117je, \u012f pareigas priimantis asmuo nesikreipia motyvuotu ra\u0161ytiniu pra\u0161ymu \u012f teis\u0117saugos, kontrol\u0117s ir kitas institucijas, \u012fstaigas ar \u012fmones, kad \u0161ios pateikt\u0173 apie tok\u012f asmen\u012f j\u0173 turim\u0105 informacij\u0105 arba pagal tok\u012f pra\u0161ym\u0105 gautos informacijos ne\u012fvertina, prie\u0161 skirdamas asmen\u012f \u012f valstyb\u0117s tarnautojo pareigas. Pasir\u0117musi byloje surinktais \u012frodymais, teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija pri\u0117jo i\u0161vados, jog \u017eem\u0117s \u016bkio ministras VT\u012e 31 straipsnio 3 dalyje nustatytas pareigas, iki skirdamas parei\u0161k\u0117j\u0105 antrai kadencijai, \u012fvykd\u0117, tad konstatuotina, kad VT\u012e 44 straipsnio 1 dalies 20 punktui taikyti nagrin\u0117jamu atveju nebuvo faktinio pagrindo.<\/p>\n<p>\u012evertinus tai, jog parei\u0161k\u0117jas pra\u0161\u0117 gr\u0105\u017einti j\u012f \u012f pareigas, o atsakovai nenurod\u0117 objektyvi\u0173 prie\u017eas\u010di\u0173, d\u0117l kuri\u0173 parei\u0161k\u0117jas negal\u0117t\u0173 toliau eiti pareig\u0173 valstyb\u0117s tarnyboje, teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija parei\u0161k\u0117j\u0105 gr\u0105\u017eino \u012f anks\u010diau eitas pareigas kartu priteisiant vidutin\u012f darbo u\u017emokest\u012f u\u017e priverstin\u0117s pravaik\u0161tos laik\u0105.<\/p>\n<p>Administracin\u0117s bylos Nr. eA-4455-552\/2018.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>Lietuvos vyriausiojo administracinio teismo informacija<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (LVAT) 2018 m. rugs\u0117jo 26 d. sprendimu patenkino parei\u0161k\u0117jo apeliacin\u012f skund\u0105, panaikindamas Lietuvos Respublikos \u017eem\u0117s \u016bkio ministro 2018 m. sausio 17 d. \u012fsakym\u0105 bei gr\u0105\u017eindamas parei\u0161k\u0117j\u0105 \u012f buvusias Nacionalin\u0117s mok\u0117jimo agent\u016bros direktoriaus pareigas, priteisiant \u0161iam i\u0161 atsakovo 22\u00a0268,57 Eur vidutin\u012f darbo u\u017emokest\u012f u\u017e priverstin\u0117s pravaik\u0161tos laik\u0105 nuo 2018 m. sausio 18 &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7369,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[438,874,539],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7368"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7368"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7368\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7370,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7368\/revisions\/7370"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7369"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}