{"id":51070,"date":"2025-10-29T20:23:53","date_gmt":"2025-10-29T17:23:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=51070"},"modified":"2025-10-29T20:24:25","modified_gmt":"2025-10-29T17:24:25","slug":"lat-tarpiniame-procese-bylinejimosi-islaidu-atlyginimas-neskirstomas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2025\/10\/29\/lat-tarpiniame-procese-bylinejimosi-islaidu-atlyginimas-neskirstomas\/","title":{"rendered":"LAT: tarpiniame procese bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginimas neskirstomas"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiasis Teismas (LAT) i\u0161ai\u0161kino (bylos <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lat.lt\/data\/public\/uploads\/2025\/10\/3k-3-129-933-2025-s.docx\" target=\"_blank\">Nr. 3K-3-129-933-2025<\/a>), kad, esant apsk\u0173stam pirmosios instancijos teismo sprendimui d\u0117l gin\u010do esm\u0117s, apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismas, spr\u0119sdamas tarpin\u012f procesin\u012f klausim\u0105 d\u0117l laikin\u0173j\u0173 apsaugos priemoni\u0173 (ne)taikymo teis\u0117tumo ir (ar) pagr\u012fstumo, neturi pagrindo paskirstyti bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginimo. Tokiu kaip nurodomas atveju tarpiniame procese patirt\u0173 bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginimas sprend\u017eiamas apeliacine tvarka nagrin\u0117jant byl\u0105 d\u0117l gin\u010do esm\u0117s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nagrin\u0117jamoje byloje ie\u0161kov\u0117 parei\u0161k\u0117 ie\u0161kin\u012f atsakovams d\u0117l \u017ealos atlyginimo, v\u0117liau teisminio nagrin\u0117jimo metu pra\u0161\u0117 taikyti laikin\u0105sias apsaugos priemones \u2013 are\u0161tuoti atsakov\u0173 turt\u0105. Pirmosios instancijos teismas nutartimi atsisak\u0117 tenkinti ie\u0161kov\u0117s pra\u0161ym\u0105, d\u0117l \u0161ios nutarties ji padav\u0117 atskir\u0105j\u012f skund\u0105. Apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismas nutart\u012f d\u0117l laikin\u0173j\u0173 apsaugos priemoni\u0173 netaikymo paliko nepakeist\u0105, priteis\u0117 atsakovui i\u0161 ie\u0161kov\u0117s bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173 u\u017e atsiliepimo \u012f atskir\u0105j\u012f skund\u0105 parengim\u0105 atlyginim\u0105.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nustat\u0119s, kad, apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismui skirstant bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laidas tarpiniame procese d\u0117l laikin\u0173j\u0173 apsaugos priemoni\u0173, d\u0117l pirmosios instancijos teismo sprendimo jau buvo paduotas ir priimtas apeliacinis skundas, kasacinis teismas panaikino Lietuvos apeliacinio teismo nutarties dal\u012f, kuria atsakovui i\u0161 ie\u0161kov\u0117s priteistas bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginimas, ir pri\u0117m\u0117 nauj\u0105 sprendim\u0105 \u2013 netenkino atsakovo pra\u0161ymo. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kasacinis teismas nustat\u0117, kad apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismas, skirstydamas bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laidas tarpiniame procese d\u0117l laikin\u0173j\u0173 apsaugos priemoni\u0173, tai padar\u0117 tuo metu, kai d\u0117l pirmosios instancijos teismo sprendimo jau buvo paduotas ir priimtas apeliacinis skundas. D\u0117l \u0161ios prie\u017easties kasacinis teismas panaikino apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismo nutarties dal\u012f, kuria atsakovui buvo priteistas bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginimas, ir pri\u0117m\u0117 nauj\u0105 sprendim\u0105 \u2013 atsakovo pra\u0161ymo netenkino.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiojo Teismo informacija<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiasis Teismas (LAT) i\u0161ai\u0161kino (bylos Nr. 3K-3-129-933-2025), kad, esant apsk\u0173stam pirmosios instancijos teismo sprendimui d\u0117l gin\u010do esm\u0117s, apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismas, spr\u0119sdamas tarpin\u012f procesin\u012f klausim\u0105 d\u0117l laikin\u0173j\u0173 apsaugos priemoni\u0173 (ne)taikymo teis\u0117tumo ir (ar) pagr\u012fstumo, neturi pagrindo paskirstyti bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginimo. Tokiu kaip nurodomas atveju tarpiniame procese patirt\u0173 bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginimas sprend\u017eiamas apeliacine tvarka nagrin\u0117jant byl\u0105 &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":41955,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[1229,220,1066],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51070"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51070"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51070\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51072,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51070\/revisions\/51072"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/41955"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51070"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51070"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51070"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}