{"id":49710,"date":"2025-06-14T11:21:09","date_gmt":"2025-06-14T08:21:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=49710"},"modified":"2025-06-14T11:21:11","modified_gmt":"2025-06-14T08:21:11","slug":"lat-turtines-zalos-atlyginimas-negali-buti-priteistas-nesant-del-to-paduoto-apeliacinio-skundo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2025\/06\/14\/lat-turtines-zalos-atlyginimas-negali-buti-priteistas-nesant-del-to-paduoto-apeliacinio-skundo\/","title":{"rendered":"LAT: turtin\u0117s \u017ealos atlyginimas negali b\u016bti priteistas nesant d\u0117l to paduoto apeliacinio skundo"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiojo Teismo (LAT) i\u0161pl\u0117stin\u0117 septyni\u0173 teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija, i\u0161nagrin\u0117jusi byl\u0105 <\/a>d\u0117l svetimo turto sugadinimo, panaikino apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismo nutarties dal\u012f, kuria i\u0161 nuteistojo nukent\u0117jusiajai priteista atlyginti 250 Eur turtin\u0119 \u017eal\u0105, padaryt\u0105 ty\u010dia sugadinant automobilio galin\u012f sparn\u0105 (BK 187 straipsnio 3 dalis), ir civilinio ie\u0161kinio dal\u012f d\u0117l turtin\u0117s \u017ealos atlyginimo paliko nenagrin\u0117t\u0105.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pirmosios instancijos teismas priteis\u0117 nukent\u0117jusiajai 100 Eur jos patirtai neturtinei \u017ealai atlyginti, o civilinio ie\u0161kinio dal\u012f d\u0117l 250 Eur turtin\u0117s \u017ealos atlyginimo atmet\u0117, padar\u0119s i\u0161vad\u0105, kad \u0161ioje byloje nukent\u0117jusiosios patirta turtin\u0117 \u017eala byloje ne\u012frodyta, kadangi u\u017e automobilio remont\u0105 sumok\u0117jo nukent\u0117jusiosios t\u0117vas ir pra\u0161oma priteisti turtin\u0117s \u017ealos atlyginimo suma n\u0117ra prie\u017eastiniu ry\u0161iu susijusi su asmens, apgadinusio automobil\u012f, veiksmais.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismas, nesant apeliacinio skundo d\u0117l tokio pirmosios instancijos teismo sprendimo, priteis\u0117 i\u0161 nuteistojo 250 Eur turtin\u0117s \u017ealos atlyginim\u0105 nukent\u0117jusiajai. Apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismas pa\u017eym\u0117jo, kad padarytos turtin\u0117s \u017ealos dydis yra ai\u0161kus ir \u012frodytas, tod\u0117l sprendimas priteisti i\u0161 nuteistojo nukent\u0117jusiajai 250 Eur turtin\u0117s \u017ealos atlyginim\u0105 priimamas nusta\u010dius b\u016btinyb\u0119 per\u017eengti apeliacinio skundo ribas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiasis Teismas konstatavo, kad apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismas, priimdamas tok\u012f sprendim\u0105, pa\u017eeid\u0117 BPK 320 straipsnio 4 dalyje \u012ftvirtint\u0105\u00a0non\u00a0reformatio\u00a0in\u00a0peius\u00a0<\/em>(draudimo bloginti nuteistojo pad\u0117t\u012f) princip\u0105, nes turtin\u0117s \u017ealos atlyginim\u0105 nukent\u0117jusiajai priteis\u0117 nesant d\u0117l to paduoto jos ar prokuroro apeliacinio skundo. Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiasis Teismas \u0161\u012f apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismo padaryt\u0105 pa\u017eeidim\u0105 pripa\u017eino esminiu BPK\u00a0320\u00a0straipsnio 4\u00a0dalies nuostat\u0173 pa\u017eeidimu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Byloje yra ir atskiroji nuomon\u0117. <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiojo Teismo informacija<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiojo Teismo (LAT) i\u0161pl\u0117stin\u0117 septyni\u0173 teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija, i\u0161nagrin\u0117jusi byl\u0105 d\u0117l svetimo turto sugadinimo, panaikino apeliacin\u0117s instancijos teismo nutarties dal\u012f, kuria i\u0161 nuteistojo nukent\u0117jusiajai priteista atlyginti 250 Eur turtin\u0119 \u017eal\u0105, padaryt\u0105 ty\u010dia sugadinant automobilio galin\u012f sparn\u0105 (BK 187 straipsnio 3 dalis), ir civilinio ie\u0161kinio dal\u012f d\u0117l turtin\u0117s \u017ealos atlyginimo paliko nenagrin\u0117t\u0105. Pirmosios instancijos teismas priteis\u0117 …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":49711,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[917,178,97,3501],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49710"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49710"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49710\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49712,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49710\/revisions\/49712"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49711"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49710"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49710"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49710"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}