{"id":4888,"date":"2018-07-05T17:48:35","date_gmt":"2018-07-05T14:48:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=4888"},"modified":"2018-07-05T18:01:30","modified_gmt":"2018-07-05T15:01:30","slug":"estt-patvirtino-kad-flylal-lithuanian-airlines-byla-pries-airbaltic-gali-buti-nagrinejama-lietuvoje","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2018\/07\/05\/estt-patvirtino-kad-flylal-lithuanian-airlines-byla-pries-airbaltic-gali-buti-nagrinejama-lietuvoje\/","title":{"rendered":"ESTT patvirtino, kad \u201eFlyLal-Lithuanian Airlines&#8221; byla prie\u0161 \u201eAirBaltic\u201c gali b\u016bti nagrin\u0117jama Lietuvoje"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Liepos 5 dien\u0105 Europos S\u0105jungos Teisingumo Teismas (ESTT) pri\u0117m\u0117 <a href=\"http:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf;jsessionid=9ea7d0f130daf06b454e1b304812bfcebb66a0ce8691.e34KaxiLc3eQc40LaxqMbN4Pb3mRe0?text=&amp;docid=203610&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=LT&amp;mode=req&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=500158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">prejudicin\u012f sprendim\u0105<\/a> ir atsak\u0119s \u012f Lietuvos apeliacinis teismo klausimus nusprend\u0117, kad Lietuvos teismai gali nagrin\u0117ti\u00a0AB \u201eFlyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines&#8221; byla prie\u0161 \u201eAir Baltic Corporation\u201c A\/S ir Rygos oro uost\u0105. Lietuvos bendrov\u0117 reikalavo atlyginti nuostolius, padarytus d\u0117l konkurencijos teis\u0117s nuostat\u0173 pa\u017eeidimo.<\/p>\n<p>ESTT nusprend\u0117, kad 2000\u00a0m. gruod\u017eio 22\u00a0d. Tarybos reglamento (EB) Nr.\u00a044\/2001 d\u0117l jurisdikcijos ir teismo sprendim\u0173 civilin\u0117se ir komercin\u0117se bylose pripa\u017einimo ir vykdymo 5\u00a0straipsnio 3\u00a0punkt\u0105 reikia ai\u0161kinti taip, kad, nagrin\u0117jant ie\u0161kin\u012f d\u0117l antikonkurenciniais veiksmais padarytos \u017ealos atlyginimo, tokioje situacijoje, kokia nagrin\u0117jama pagrindin\u0117je byloje, \u201evieta, kurioje \u012fvyko \u017eal\u0105 suk\u0117l\u0119s \u012fvykis\u201c, be kita ko, rei\u0161kia d\u0117l pardavim\u0173 suma\u017e\u0117jimo negaut\u0173 pajam\u0173 viet\u0105, tai yra \u0161i\u0173 veiksm\u0173 paveiktos rinkos, kurioje nukent\u0117jusioji \u0161alis tvirtina patyrusi \u0161\u012f pardavim\u0173 suma\u017e\u0117jim\u0105, viet\u0105.<\/p>\n<p class=\"C08Dispositif\">Reglamento Nr.\u00a044\/2001\u00a05\u00a0straipsnio 3\u00a0punktas turi b\u016bti ai\u0161kinamas taip, kad, nagrin\u0117jant ie\u0161kin\u012f d\u0117l\u00a0 antikonkurenciniais veiksmais padarytos \u017ealos atlyginimo, s\u0105voka \u201evieta, kurioje \u012fvyko \u017eal\u0105 suk\u0117l\u0119s \u012fvykis\u201c gali b\u016bti suprantama kaip SESV\u00a0101\u00a0straipsniui prie\u0161taraujan\u010dio antikonkurencinio susitarimo sudarymo vieta arba kaip vieta, kurioje buvo si\u016blomos ir taikomos grobuoni\u0161kos kainos, jeigu \u0161i veikla yra SESV\u00a0102\u00a0straipsnio pa\u017eeidimas.<\/p>\n<p class=\"C08Dispositif\">Be to, Reglamento Nr.\u00a044\/2001\u00a05\u00a0straipsnio 5\u00a0punktas turi b\u016bti ai\u0161kinamas taip, kad s\u0105voka \u201egin\u010das, susij\u0119s su filialo veikla\u201c apima ie\u0161kin\u012f d\u0117l piktnaud\u017eiavimu dominuojan\u010dia pad\u0117timi taikant grobuoni\u0161kas kainas tariamai padarytos \u017ealos atlyginimo, kai dominuojan\u010di\u0105 pad\u0117t\u012f u\u017eiman\u010dios \u012fmon\u0117s filialas i\u0161 tikr\u0173j\u0173 ir reik\u0161mingai dalyvavo piktnaud\u017eiavimo veikloje.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Liepos 5 dien\u0105 Europos S\u0105jungos Teisingumo Teismas (ESTT) pri\u0117m\u0117 prejudicin\u012f sprendim\u0105 ir atsak\u0119s \u012f Lietuvos apeliacinis teismo klausimus nusprend\u0117, kad Lietuvos teismai gali nagrin\u0117ti\u00a0AB \u201eFlyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines&#8221; byla prie\u0161 \u201eAir Baltic Corporation\u201c A\/S ir Rygos oro uost\u0105. Lietuvos bendrov\u0117 reikalavo atlyginti nuostolius, padarytus d\u0117l konkurencijos teis\u0117s nuostat\u0173 pa\u017eeidimo. ESTT nusprend\u0117, kad 2000\u00a0m. gruod\u017eio 22\u00a0d. Tarybos reglamento &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":4889,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[620,109,108,634],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4888"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4888"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4888\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4893,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4888\/revisions\/4893"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4889"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}