{"id":45274,"date":"2024-04-21T11:41:29","date_gmt":"2024-04-21T08:41:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=45274"},"modified":"2024-04-21T11:41:30","modified_gmt":"2024-04-21T08:41:30","slug":"lat-pateike-teises-aiskinimo-ir-taikymo-taisykle-del-islaidu-advokato-pagalbai-byloje-apmoketi-atlyginimo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2024\/04\/21\/lat-pateike-teises-aiskinimo-ir-taikymo-taisykle-del-islaidu-advokato-pagalbai-byloje-apmoketi-atlyginimo\/","title":{"rendered":"LAT pateik\u0117 teis\u0117s ai\u0161kinimo ir taikymo taisykl\u0119 d\u0117l i\u0161laid\u0173 advokato pagalbai byloje apmok\u0117ti atlyginimo"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Baland\u017eio 19 d. Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiojo Teismo (LAT) Civilini\u0173 byl\u0173 skyriaus i\u0161pl\u0117stin\u0117 teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija <a href=\"https:\/\/liteko.teismai.lt\/viesasprendimupaieska\/tekstas.aspx?id=153a25da-b8a6-44d2-a107-ca02ae69354e\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">nutartyje<\/a> pateik\u0117 svarbius i\u0161ai\u0161kinimus d\u0117l i\u0161laid\u0173 advokato pagalbai apmok\u0117ti atlyginimo. I\u0161pl\u0117stin\u0117 teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija, \u012fvertinusi suformuot\u0105 kasacinio teismo praktik\u0105 d\u0117l i\u0161laid\u0173 advokato pagalbai apmok\u0117ti atlyginimo, konstatavo, kad\u00a0\u0161i praktika, pagal kuri\u0105\u00a0draudimas byloje priteisti \u0161i\u0173 i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginim\u0105 d\u0117l to, kad\u00a0jos nebuvo\u00a0apmok\u0117tos\u00a0iki bylos i\u0161nagrin\u0117jimo pabaigos\u00a0ir\u00a0teismui nebuvo pateiktas tai patvirtinantis dokumentas, o to nepadariusi\u00a0\u0161alis turi\u00a0galimyb\u0119\u00a0i\u0161 naujo\u00a0kreiptis \u012f teism\u0105 d\u0117l papildomo sprendimo pri\u0117mimo,\u00a0koreguotina,\u00a0nes\u00a0pilnai\u00a0neu\u017etikrina tinkamo\u00a0asmens teis\u0117s \u012f teismin\u0119 gynyb\u0105 \u012fgyvendinimo\u00a0ir\u00a0asmens\u00a0teis\u0117s\u00a0\u012f atstovavim\u0105,\u00a0neatitinka\u00a0bendr\u0173j\u0173\u00a0teisingumo ir protingumo, proceso koncentracijos ir ekonomi\u0161kumo princip\u0173\u00a0bei CPK 2 straipsnyje \u012ftvirtinto\u00a0civilinio proceso tikslo\u00a0ginti asmen\u0173, kuri\u0173 materialin\u0117s subjektin\u0117s teis\u0117s ar saugomi interesai pa\u017eeisti ar gin\u010dijami, interesus. I\u0161pl\u0117stin\u0117 teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija konstatavo esant pagrind\u0105,\u00a0<em>mutatis\u00a0mutandis<\/em>, atsi\u017evelgti ir \u012f E\u017dTT formuluojamus bendruosius principus teisingo bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginimo priteisimo\u00a0klausimu. E\u017dTT praktikoje realumo kriterij\u0173 atitinkan\u010diomis i\u0161laidomis pripa\u017e\u012fstamos ne tik jau patirtos i\u0161laidos, bet ir i\u0161laidos, kurios nei\u0161vengiamai bus patirtos\u00a0pagal\u00a0jas atlyginti pra\u0161an\u010dios\u00a0\u0161alies teisinius ar sutartinius \u012fsipareigojimus. Toks bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173 realumo kriterijaus ai\u0161kinimas atitinka ir bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173, kaip\u00a0nuostoli\u0173, susijusi\u0173 su civiliniu procesu, r\u016b\u0161ies, samprat\u0105.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I\u0161pl\u0117stin\u0117 teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija\u00a0konstatavo, jog\u00a0CPK 98 straipsnio\u00a01\u00a0dalies\u00a0nuostata,\u00a0\u012ftvirtinanti \u0161alies pareig\u0105\u00a0teismui ra\u0161tu pateikti\u00a0pra\u0161ym\u0105 su i\u0161laid\u0173 apskai\u010diavimu ir pagrindimu, kartu ribojanti toki\u0173 i\u0161laid\u0173\u00a0atlyginimo\u00a0priteisim\u0105, jeigu pra\u0161ymas d\u0117l jo\u00a0priteisimo ir i\u0161laid\u0173 dyd\u012f patvirtinantys \u012frodymai nepateikti iki bylos i\u0161nagrin\u0117jimo i\u0161 esm\u0117s pabaigos,\u00a0negali b\u016bti ai\u0161kinama\u00a0kaip u\u017ekertanti keli\u0105 \u0161ali\u0173 susitarimu\u00a0atid\u0117ti i\u0161laid\u0173 advokato pagalbai apmok\u0117jim\u0105, o teismui\u00a0\u2013\u00a0spr\u0119sti d\u0117l toki\u0173 atid\u0117t\u0173 i\u0161laid\u0173\u00a0atlyginimo\u00a0priteisimo i\u0161 prie\u0161ingos \u0161alies. CPK 98 straipsnio 1 dalis ai\u0161kintina kaip \u012ftvirtinanti pareig\u0105 bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginimo siekian\u010diai \u0161aliai\u00a0iki bylos i\u0161nagrin\u0117jimo i\u0161 esm\u0117s pabaigos\u00a0teismui\u00a0pateikti dokumentus, patvirtinan\u010dius\u00a0konkre\u010dias\u00a0advokato\u00a0(advokato pad\u0117j\u0117jo)\u00a0suteiktas paslaugas ir j\u0173\u00a0kain\u0105\u00a0(dyd\u012f), o ne\u00a0\u0161i\u0173 i\u0161laid\u0173 apmok\u0117jim\u0105.\u00a0Esant\u00a0\u0161alies\u00a0ir advokato susitarimui d\u0117l\u00a0atitinkam\u0173 atstovavimo\u00a0paslaug\u0173\u00a0kainos ir j\u0173\u00a0apmok\u0117jimo, n\u0117ra\u00a0b\u016btinyb\u0117s\u00a0teismui reikalauti, o \u0161aliai\u00a0\u2013\u00a0pateikti \u012f byl\u0105 duomenis, d\u0117l kokios prie\u017easties i\u0161laidos advokato pagalbai apmok\u0117ti nebuvo apmok\u0117tos iki bylos i\u0161nagrin\u0117jimo pabaigos. Teismui sprend\u017eiant d\u0117l pagrindo priteisti \u0161i\u0173 i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginim\u0105 i\u0161 byl\u0105 pralaim\u0117jusios \u0161alies,\u00a0j\u0173 realum\u0105 (nei\u0161vengiamum\u0105) patvirtina byl\u0105 laim\u0117jusios \u0161alies \u012fsipareigojimas advokatui \u0161ias i\u0161laidas apmok\u0117ti ir advokato sutikimas atid\u0117ti suteikt\u0173\u00a0teisini\u0173\u00a0paslaug\u0173\u00a0apmok\u0117jim\u0105.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I\u0161pl\u0117stin\u0117 teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija, vadovaudamasi CPK 361\u00a0straipsnio 4 dalies 2 punktu, suformulavo toki\u0105 teis\u0117s ai\u0161kinimo ir taikymo taisykl\u0119: <em>CPK 98\u00a0straipsnio\u00a01\u00a0dalyje nustatytas reikalavimas\u00a0\u0161aliai,\u00a0siekian\u010diai\u00a0i\u0161laid\u0173 advokato pagalbai\u00a0byloje\u00a0apmok\u0117ti\u00a0atlyginimo,\u00a0ra\u0161tu\u00a0teismui\u00a0pateikti pra\u0161ym\u0105 su i\u0161laid\u0173 apskai\u010diavimu ir pagrindimu\u00a0ai\u0161kintinas kaip \u0161alies pareiga\u00a0teismui\u00a0kartu su pra\u0161ymu\u00a0pateikti\u00a0dokumentus, patvirtinan\u010dius,\u00a0kokios atstovavimo paslaugos \u0161aliai\u00a0buvo\u00a0suteiktos ir kokia yra \u0161i\u0173 paslaug\u0173 kaina.\u00a0Jeigu \u0161ios i\u0161laidos n\u0117ra apmokamos iki bylos i\u0161nagrin\u0117jimo i\u0161 esm\u0117s pabaigos, tai \u0161i\u0173 i\u0161laid\u0173 realumui patvirtinti\u00a0nurodytu terminu\u00a0\u0161alis teismui turi pateikti\u00a0dokument\u0105, patvirtinant\u012f\u00a0jos susitarim\u0105\u00a0su advokatu\u00a0d\u0117l atstovavimo i\u0161laid\u0173 apmok\u0117jimo ateityje, ta\u010diau\u00a0\u0161aliai neb\u016btina teismui\u00a0pagr\u012fsti\u00a0atstovavimo\u00a0i\u0161laid\u0173\u00a0iki bylos i\u0161nagrin\u0117jimo pabaigos\u00a0neapmok\u0117jimo prie\u017easties.\u00a0Tuo atveju, kai,\u00a0teismui priimant\u00a0galutin\u012f\u00a0sprendim\u0105\u00a0(nutart\u012f),\u00a0atstovavimo i\u0161laidos\u00a0\u0161alies dar n\u0117ra apmok\u0117tos,\u00a0sprend\u017eiant d\u0117l \u0161aliai\u00a0priteistino\u00a0i\u0161 byl\u0105 pralaim\u0117jusios \u0161alies atstovavimo i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginimo dyd\u017eio\u00a0pagal Rekomendacij\u0173 7 punkt\u0105, taikytinas koeficientas nustatomas pagal teismo sprendimo, kuriuo paskirstomos bylin\u0117jimosi i\u0161laidos, pri\u0117mimo dat\u0105.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Baland\u017eio 19 d. Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiojo Teismo (LAT) Civilini\u0173 byl\u0173 skyriaus i\u0161pl\u0117stin\u0117 teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija nutartyje pateik\u0117 svarbius i\u0161ai\u0161kinimus d\u0117l i\u0161laid\u0173 advokato pagalbai apmok\u0117ti atlyginimo. I\u0161pl\u0117stin\u0117 teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija, \u012fvertinusi suformuot\u0105 kasacinio teismo praktik\u0105 d\u0117l i\u0161laid\u0173 advokato pagalbai apmok\u0117ti atlyginimo, konstatavo, kad\u00a0\u0161i praktika, pagal kuri\u0105\u00a0draudimas byloje priteisti \u0161i\u0173 i\u0161laid\u0173 atlyginim\u0105 d\u0117l to, kad\u00a0jos nebuvo\u00a0apmok\u0117tos\u00a0iki bylos i\u0161nagrin\u0117jimo pabaigos\u00a0ir\u00a0teismui nebuvo &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":45275,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[33,32],"tags":[529,1229,220,97],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45274"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45274"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45274\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45276,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45274\/revisions\/45276"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/45275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}