{"id":38556,"date":"2022-10-21T16:13:49","date_gmt":"2022-10-21T13:13:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=38556"},"modified":"2022-10-21T16:14:44","modified_gmt":"2022-10-21T13:14:44","slug":"38556","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2022\/10\/21\/38556\/","title":{"rendered":"LVAT sprendimas d\u0117l reik\u0161ming\u0173 teis\u0117s praktikams duomen\u0173 apsaugos aspekt\u0173"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (LVAT) pri\u0117m\u0117 <a href=\"https:\/\/liteko.teismai.lt\/viesasprendimupaieska\/tekstas.aspx?id=c4dee44d-1bc5-4283-b398-4690a75132a8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">sprendim\u0105, <\/a>kuriame pa\u017eym\u0117jo teis\u0117s praktikams reik\u0161mingus profesin\u0117s veiklos aspektus d\u0117l duomen\u0173 apsaugos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Administracin\u0117je byloje kilo gin\u010das d\u0117l to, jog advokatas kreip\u0117si \u012f Registr\u0173 centr\u0105 (RC) su pra\u0161ymu gauti reikalingus duomenis, siekiant tinkamai atstovauti klient\u0105. Valstybin\u0117 duomen\u0173 apsaugos inspekcijos nuomone, advokatas pa\u017eeid\u0117 BDAR ir netur\u0117jo gauti pra\u0161om\u0173 duomen\u0173 i\u0161 RC, d\u0117lto ir buvo kreiptasi ne tik \u012f Lietuvos advokat\u016bros Drausm\u0117s komitet\u0105, bet ir teism\u0105.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Advokat\u0173 taryba atsisak\u0117 kelti drausm\u0117s byl\u0105 advokato at\u017evilgiu, nes nemat\u0117 advokato profesin\u0117s etikos pa\u017eeidim\u0173 d\u0117l kliento atstovavimo ir informacijos rinkimo i\u0161 RC. T\u0105 pat\u012f nustat\u0117 ir byl\u0105 nagrin\u0117j\u0119s Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas sprendimu \u2013 advokatas pateik\u0117 tinkamus ir motyvuotus pra\u0161ymus, nor\u0117damas tinkamai atstovauti klient\u0105.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tenkinant advokato apeliacin\u012f skund\u0105, LVAT pri\u0117m\u0117 galutin\u012f ir neskund\u017eiam\u0105 sprendim\u0105, kuriuo pa\u017eym\u0117jo itin reik\u0161mingus advokato praktika u\u017esiimantiems profesionalams aspektus:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>advokatai, nor\u0117dami i\u0161 RC gauti bet kokius duomenis, b\u016btinus teisin\u0117ms paslaugos atlikti (tiek teis\u0117s konsultacijoms, tiek teisin\u0119 reik\u0161m\u0119 turin\u010di\u0173 dokument\u0173 rengimui, tiek atstovavimui teis\u0117s klausimais, tiek gynybai bei atstovavimui byl\u0173 procese), privalo nurodyti \u0161i\u0173 duomen\u0173 reikalingum\u0105, pagr\u012fsdami j\u0173 ry\u0161\u012f su teisin\u0117mis paslaugomis;<\/li><li>siekiant teikti kokybi\u0161kas teisines paslaugas, advokatai turi teis\u0119 nuspr\u0119sti, kokie duomenys jiems yra reikalingi, priklausomai nuo teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173 teikimo apimties;<\/li><li>visais atvejais advokato interesas i\u0161 RC gauti teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173 teikimui reikalingus duomenis yra vir\u0161esnis u\u017e duomen\u0173 subjekto, kurio asmens duomenys yra registruose, interesus;<\/li><li>RC gali atsisakyti teikti duomenis advokatui tik tuo atveju, jei advokato kreipimesi apskritai n\u0117ra duomen\u0173, \u012frodan\u010di\u0173 pra\u0161om\u0173 pateikti dokument\u0173 ry\u0161\u012f su teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173 teikimu.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Lietuvos advokat\u016bros informacija<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (LVAT) pri\u0117m\u0117 sprendim\u0105, kuriame pa\u017eym\u0117jo teis\u0117s praktikams reik\u0161mingus profesin\u0117s veiklos aspektus d\u0117l duomen\u0173 apsaugos. Administracin\u0117je byloje kilo gin\u010das d\u0117l to, jog advokatas kreip\u0117si \u012f Registr\u0173 centr\u0105 (RC) su pra\u0161ymu gauti reikalingus duomenis, siekiant tinkamai atstovauti klient\u0105. Valstybin\u0117 duomen\u0173 apsaugos inspekcijos nuomone, advokatas pa\u017eeid\u0117 BDAR ir netur\u0117jo gauti pra\u0161om\u0173 duomen\u0173 i\u0161 RC, &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":38557,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[33,32],"tags":[529,465,438,1028],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38556"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38556"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38556\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38559,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38556\/revisions\/38559"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/38557"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}