{"id":3065,"date":"2018-05-16T13:24:50","date_gmt":"2018-05-16T10:24:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=3065"},"modified":"2018-05-16T18:04:50","modified_gmt":"2018-05-16T15:04:50","slug":"3065","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2018\/05\/16\/3065\/","title":{"rendered":"Institucijoms si\u016bloma siekti didesnio skaidrumo perkant teisines paslaugas"},"content":{"rendered":"

Speciali\u0173j\u0173 tyrim\u0173 tarnybos (STT) prevencijos specialistai, \u012fvertin\u0119 perkan\u010di\u0173j\u0173 organizacij\u0173 \u2013 ministerij\u0173 ir savivaldybi\u0173 \u2013 informacij\u0105 d\u0117l j\u0173 perkam\u0173 teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173, nustat\u0117, kad dauguma \u012fstaig\u0173 (apie 80 proc.), tur\u0117damos savo teisininkus, pirko teisines paslaugas.<\/strong><\/p>\n

74 institucij\u0173 buvo pra\u0161oma atsakyti \u012f klausimus: kokie motyvai l\u0117m\u0117 teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173 pirkimo poreik\u012f 2016\u20132017 m.; kaip nuspr\u0119sta pasirinkti teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173 tiek\u0117j\u0105; kokios buvo i\u0161laidos teisin\u0117ms paslaugoms; ar institucijos turi detalizuot\u0105 teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173 pirkimo tvark\u0105.<\/p>\n

STT surinkusi ir i\u0161analizavusi atsakymus nustat\u0117, kad da\u017eniausias naudotas pirkimo b\u016bdas \u2013 neskelbiama apklausa, kai apie pirkim\u0105 informuojami tik keli advokatai, o kartais \u2013 tik vienas. Nors dauguma institucij\u0173 pana\u0161iai pagrind\u0117 poreik\u012f pirkimams: ypa\u010d sud\u0117tingos, didel\u0117s vert\u0117s bylos, tarptautiniai projektai, nepakanka \u017emogi\u0161k\u0173j\u0173 i\u0161tekli\u0173, tam tikros teis\u0117s srities geresnis i\u0161manymas, specializacija ir pan., ta\u010diau kai kurios institucijos pirko teisines paslaugas nesud\u0117tingiems vidaus teis\u0117s aktams parengti.<\/p>\n

STT nuomone, kai kuri\u0173 institucij\u0173 motyvas d\u0117l \u017emogi\u0161k\u0173j\u0173 i\u0161tekli\u0173 tr\u016bkumo kartais n\u0117ra \u012ftikinamas, nes institucijoje dirba ne vienas ar du teisininkai, o pirkimai neb\u016bna labai sud\u0117tingi, ta\u010diau sumos i\u0161leid\u017eiamos nema\u017eos. Pavyzd\u017eiui, vienos savivaldyb\u0117s 2016\u20132017 m. i\u0161laidos perkant teisines paslaugas sudar\u0117 daugiau nei 140 t\u016bkst. eur\u0173.<\/p>\n

STT nustat\u0117, kad n\u0117 viena \u012fstaiga neturi pasitvirtinusi detalizuoto teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173 s\u0105ra\u0161o, kuris b\u016bt\u0173 kaip metodin\u0117 priemon\u0117 \u012fstaigoms prie\u0161 perkant teisines paslaugas. STT, siekdama, kad proced\u016bros institucijose vykt\u0173 skaidriai ir nekilt\u0173 abejoni\u0173 d\u0117l galimybi\u0173 piktnaud\u017eiauti, rekomenduoja tur\u0117ti tok\u012f teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173 s\u0105ra\u0161\u0105. STT si\u016blo institucijoms, ketinan\u010dioms pirkti teisines paslaugas, i\u0161samiai \u012fvertinti \u012fstaigos turimas galimybes pa\u010dioms atlikti \u0161ias funkcijas, o sudariusioms paslaug\u0173 teikimo sutart\u012f \u2013 nuolat vertinti paslaug\u0173 u\u017esakymo poreik\u012f.<\/p>\n

Yra ir ger\u0173 pavyzd\u017ei\u0173: Energetikos ministerija informavo, kad ketina parengti pirkim\u0173, nepatenkan\u010di\u0173 \u012f Lietuvos Respublikos vie\u0161\u0173j\u0173 pirkim\u0173 \u012fstatymo reglamentavimo srit\u012f, tvarkos apra\u0161\u0105, pagal kur\u012f detalizuos teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173 pirkimo poreik\u012f, nurodys apklaustus tiek\u0117jus, paai\u0161kins, kod\u0117l pasirinktas vienas ar kitas tiek\u0117jas, aptars esmines sutarties s\u0105lygas.<\/p>\n

Antikorupcinio vertinimo i\u0161vad\u0105 galite rasti \u010dia<\/a><\/p>\n

Informacija paimta i\u0161 oficialios STT svetain\u0117s.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Speciali\u0173j\u0173 tyrim\u0173 tarnybos (STT) prevencijos specialistai, \u012fvertin\u0119 perkan\u010di\u0173j\u0173 organizacij\u0173 \u2013 ministerij\u0173 ir savivaldybi\u0173 \u2013 informacij\u0105 d\u0117l j\u0173 perkam\u0173 teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173, nustat\u0117, kad dauguma \u012fstaig\u0173 (apie 80 proc.), tur\u0117damos savo teisininkus, pirko teisines paslaugas. 74 institucij\u0173 buvo pra\u0161oma atsakyti \u012f klausimus: kokie motyvai l\u0117m\u0117 teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173 pirkimo poreik\u012f 2016\u20132017 m.; kaip nuspr\u0119sta pasirinkti teisini\u0173 paslaug\u0173 tiek\u0117j\u0105; …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3067,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[453,452,454,450,451,180],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3065"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3065"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3065\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3072,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3065\/revisions\/3072"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3067"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3065"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}