{"id":17688,"date":"2019-10-01T09:33:25","date_gmt":"2019-10-01T06:33:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=17688"},"modified":"2019-10-01T10:09:15","modified_gmt":"2019-10-01T07:09:15","slug":"d-puraite-andrikiene-konstitucinio-teismo-nutarimu-padariniai-laiko-aspektu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2019\/10\/01\/d-puraite-andrikiene-konstitucinio-teismo-nutarimu-padariniai-laiko-aspektu\/","title":{"rendered":"D. P\u016brait\u0117-Andrikien\u0117. KONSTITUCINIO TEISMO NUTARIM\u0172 PADARINIAI LAIKO ASPEKTU"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.zurnalai.vu.lt\/teise\/article\/view\/14481\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Straipsnyje nagrin\u0117jama Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo nutarim\u0173 teisin\u0117 galia laiko po\u017ei\u016briu, t. y.\u00a0<em>ex tunc, ex nunc<\/em>\u00a0ir\u00a0<em>pro futuro<\/em>\u00a0sprendim\u0173 teisin\u0117s galios elementai Lietuvos konstitucin\u0117s justicijos modelyje. Straipsnyje siekiama atskleisti Konstitucijos 107 straipsnio 1 dalyje \u012ftvirtintos taisykl\u0117s, kad Konstitucinio Teismo sprendim\u0173 galia yra nukreipiama \u012f ateit\u012f, i\u0161im\u010di\u0173 doktrinos raid\u0105 Konstitucinio Teismo jurisprudencijoje, ir tolesnes \u0161io instituto raidos perspektyvas,\u00a0<em>inter alia,<\/em>\u00a0atsi\u017evelgiant \u012f 2019 m. priimt\u0105 Konstitucijos patais\u0105 d\u0117l individualaus konstitucinio skundo \u012ftvirtinimo.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Straipsnyje nagrin\u0117jama Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo nutarim\u0173 teisin\u0117 galia laiko po\u017ei\u016briu, t. y.\u00a0ex tunc, ex nunc\u00a0ir\u00a0pro futuro\u00a0sprendim\u0173 teisin\u0117s galios elementai Lietuvos konstitucin\u0117s justicijos modelyje. Straipsnyje siekiama atskleisti Konstitucijos 107 straipsnio 1 dalyje \u012ftvirtintos taisykl\u0117s, kad Konstitucinio Teismo sprendim\u0173 galia yra nukreipiama \u012f ateit\u012f, i\u0161im\u010di\u0173 doktrinos raid\u0105 Konstitucinio Teismo jurisprudencijoje, ir tolesnes \u0161io instituto raidos perspektyvas,\u00a0inter &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[1884,31],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17688"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17688"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17688\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17690,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17688\/revisions\/17690"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}