{"id":15090,"date":"2019-05-20T20:05:43","date_gmt":"2019-05-20T17:05:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=15090"},"modified":"2019-05-20T20:05:43","modified_gmt":"2019-05-20T17:05:43","slug":"lat-apie-galimybes-pareiksti-alternatyvius-ieskinio-reikalavimus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2019\/05\/20\/lat-apie-galimybes-pareiksti-alternatyvius-ieskinio-reikalavimus\/","title":{"rendered":"LAT apie galimybes pareik\u0161ti alternatyvius ie\u0161kinio reikalavimus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Civilin\u0117je byloje ie\u0161kov\u0117 pra\u0161\u0117 teismo i\u0161reikalauti i\u0161 atsakov\u0173 neteis\u0117to valdymo kilnojamuosius daiktus, o j\u0173 nesant priteisti ie\u0161kovei solidariai i\u0161 atsakov\u0173 \u0161i\u0173 daikt\u0173 vert\u0117s atlyginim\u0105 pinigais. Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiojo Teismo (LAT) Civilini\u0173 byl\u0173 skyriaus teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija gegu\u017e\u0117s 16 dien\u0105 <a href=\"http:\/\/liteko.teismai.lt\/viesasprendimupaieska\/tekstas.aspx?id=95262a40-a54e-45e2-8227-86d67bac5ac7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pasisak\u0117<\/a>, kad\u00a0teismams nusta\u010dius,\u00a0jog gin\u010do objekt\u0173 atsakov\u0173 sodyboje n\u0117ra\u00a0ir d\u0117l to n\u0117ra teisinio pagrindo tenkinti vindikacin\u012f ie\u0161kin\u012f, d\u0117l antrojo (alternatyvaus) ie\u0161kov\u0117s reikalavimo \u2013 priteisti daikt\u0173 vert\u0119 pinigais \u2013 pagr\u012fstumo teismai i\u0161 esm\u0117s nesprend\u0117, \u0161io reikalavimo teisi\u0161kai nekvalifikavo, nevertino atitinkam\u0173 bylos duomen\u0173, nenustat\u0117 teisi\u0161kai reik\u0161ming\u0173 aplinkybi\u0173 (ne)\u012frodytumo\u00a0ir (ar) ne\u012fvertino jau nustatyt\u0173 aplinkybi\u0173.<\/p>\n<p>Vietoj to teismai pasisak\u0117 d\u0117l \u0161alies (ne)siejan\u010di\u0173\u00a0prievolini\u0173 santyki\u0173, kaip pagrindo taikyti restitucij\u0105 (ne)buvimo.\u00a0Teism\u0173 nepagr\u012fstai nespr\u0119sta, ar bylos duomenys (ne)patvirtina, jog gin\u010do daiktai sodyboje buvo. Nusta\u010dius aplinkyb\u0119, kad atsakovei nuosavyb\u0117s teise priklausantys gin\u010do daiktai sodyboje buvo, spr\u0119stina,\u00a0d\u0117l kieno (neteis\u0117t\u0173) veiksm\u0173 jie buvo prarasti (nei\u0161saugoti), ar turi ir kas turi ie\u0161kovei atlyginti \u017eal\u0105, kokio dyd\u017eio \u017eal\u0105 ie\u0161kov\u0117 patyr\u0117, ar jos dydis (ne)ma\u017eintinas, atsi\u017evelgiant \u012f ie\u0161kov\u0117s veiksmus (neveikim\u0105).<\/p>\n<p>Ie\u0161kov\u0117 ai\u0161kiai suformulavo alternatyv\u0173 ie\u0161kinio reikalavim\u0105 (priteisti gin\u010do objekt\u0173 vert\u0119\u00a0pinigais), ta\u010diau \u0161i\u0105 byl\u0105 nagrin\u0117j\u0119 teismai nepagr\u012fstai teisi\u0161kai \u0161io reikalavimo nekvalifikavo, nei\u0161tyr\u0117 vis\u0173 bylai i\u0161spr\u0119sti reik\u0161ming\u0173 aplinkybi\u0173, reikalavim\u0105 atmet\u0117 i\u0161 esm\u0117s to nemotyvuodami. Tai suponuoja, kad nebuvo atskleista bylos esm\u0117 ir d\u0117l teism\u0173 padaryt\u0173 pa\u017eeidim\u0173 byla gal\u0117jo b\u016bti i\u0161spr\u0119sta neteisingai.<\/p>\n<p>Ie\u0161kovas, atsi\u017evelgdamas \u012f materialin\u012f teisin\u012f reguliavim\u0105, teismui pateikiamame ie\u0161kinyje gali nurodyti alternatyvius ie\u0161kinio reikalavimus. Alternatyvi\u0173 ie\u0161kovo reikalavim\u0173 nurodymas rei\u0161kia, kad ie\u0161kovas, kreipdamasis \u012f teism\u0105 teismin\u0117s gynybos, apibr\u0117\u017eia teisme nagrin\u0117tino gin\u010do ribas tokiu b\u016bdu, kad bet kurio i\u0161 pareik\u0161t\u0173 reikalavim\u0173 patenkinimas reik\u0161t\u0173 kilusio gin\u010do i\u0161sprendim\u0105 i\u0161 esm\u0117s. Toki\u0173 reikalavim\u0173 esm\u0117 yra ta, kad vienas ie\u0161kinio reikalavimas pa\u0161alina kito galimyb\u0119, ta\u010diau bet kuriuo i\u0161 j\u0173 yra siekiama apginti pa\u017eeistas ar gin\u010dijamas asmens materialines subjektines\u00a0teises arba \u012fstatymo saugomus interesus.<\/p>\n<p>Kartu teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija atkreip\u0117 d\u0117mes\u012f, kad teis\u0117 spr\u0119sti, ar i\u0161kil\u0119s teis\u0117s ai\u0161kinimo ir taikymo klausimas yra sud\u0117tingas ir toks sud\u0117tingumas yra pakankamas pagrindas perduoti byl\u0105 nagrin\u0117ti i\u0161pl\u0117stinei septyni\u0173 teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegijai, vis\u0173 pirma priklauso byl\u0105 nagrin\u0117jan\u010dios teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegijos diskrecijai.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Civilin\u0117je byloje ie\u0161kov\u0117 pra\u0161\u0117 teismo i\u0161reikalauti i\u0161 atsakov\u0173 neteis\u0117to valdymo kilnojamuosius daiktus, o j\u0173 nesant priteisti ie\u0161kovei solidariai i\u0161 atsakov\u0173 \u0161i\u0173 daikt\u0173 vert\u0117s atlyginim\u0105 pinigais. Lietuvos Auk\u0161\u010diausiojo Teismo (LAT) Civilini\u0173 byl\u0173 skyriaus teis\u0117j\u0173 kolegija gegu\u017e\u0117s 16 dien\u0105 pasisak\u0117, kad\u00a0teismams nusta\u010dius,\u00a0jog gin\u010do objekt\u0173 atsakov\u0173 sodyboje n\u0117ra\u00a0ir d\u0117l to n\u0117ra teisinio pagrindo tenkinti vindikacin\u012f ie\u0161kin\u012f, d\u0117l antrojo &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":15091,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[1627,220,1626,97],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15090"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15090"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15090\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15092,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15090\/revisions\/15092"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15091"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}