{"id":13969,"date":"2019-04-10T08:03:07","date_gmt":"2019-04-10T05:03:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=13969"},"modified":"2019-04-10T08:03:07","modified_gmt":"2019-04-10T05:03:07","slug":"lvat-patvirtino-isvadas-del-kartelio-viesuosiuose-pirkimuose","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2019\/04\/10\/lvat-patvirtino-isvadas-del-kartelio-viesuosiuose-pirkimuose\/","title":{"rendered":"LVAT patvirtino i\u0161vadas d\u0117l kartelio vie\u0161uosiuose pirkimuose"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (LVAT) paliko galioti pirmosios instancijos teismo sprendim\u0105, kuriuo pripa\u017einta, kad Konkurencijos taryba pagr\u012fstai nustat\u0117, jog bendrov\u0117s\u00a0\u201e\u017dagar\u0117s in\u017einerija\u201c ir \u201eRovaltra\u201c, dalyvaudamos vie\u0161ajame pirkime technikai pirkti, derino komercinius pasi\u016blymus ir taip pa\u017eeid\u0117 Konkurencijos \u012fstatym\u0105.<\/p>\n<p>LVAT paskelb\u0117, kad Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas i\u0161samiai i\u0161tyr\u0117 bylos aplinkybes ir pri\u0117m\u0117 pagr\u012fst\u0105 sprendim\u0105, tod\u0117l atmet\u0117 bendrov\u0117s \u201eRovaltra\u201c apeliacin\u012f skund\u0105, kuriuo \u0161i pra\u0161\u0117 panaikinti Konkurencijos tarybos sprendim\u0105 arba suma\u017einti baud\u0105.<\/p>\n<p>Pirmosios instancijos teismas buvo atmet\u0119s abiej\u0173 \u012fmoni\u0173 skundus ir patvirtin\u0119s Konkurencijos tarybos u\u017e kartel\u012f skirtas baudas: \u201eRovaltrai\u201c \u2013 70\u00a0400 Eur, \u201e\u017dagar\u0117s in\u017einerijai\u201c \u2013 33\u00a0400 Eur.\u00a0 Abu teismai pripa\u017eino, kad 2014 m. vie\u0161ajame pirkime dalyvavusios min\u0117tos bendrov\u0117s pateik\u0117\u00a0tarpusavyje suderintus komercinius pasi\u016blymus ir i\u0161 anksto nustat\u0117 laim\u0117toj\u0105.<\/p>\n<p>LVAT patvirtino, kad tais atvejais, kai \u016bkio subjektai komercini\u0173 pasi\u016blym\u0173 s\u0105lygas i\u0161 anksto suderina prie\u0161 juos pateikdami vie\u0161uosius pirkimus rengian\u010diai organizacijai, laim\u0117toj\u0105 lemia ne konkurencin\u0117 kova, o\u00a0\u0161ankstinis \u016bkio subjekt\u0173 susitarimas. To pasekm\u0117 \u2013 vie\u0161\u0173j\u0173 pirkim\u0173 proced\u016bra tampa fiktyvi ir praranda savo prasm\u0119.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>Konkurencijos tarybos informacija<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (LVAT) paliko galioti pirmosios instancijos teismo sprendim\u0105, kuriuo pripa\u017einta, kad Konkurencijos taryba pagr\u012fstai nustat\u0117, jog bendrov\u0117s\u00a0\u201e\u017dagar\u0117s in\u017einerija\u201c ir \u201eRovaltra\u201c, dalyvaudamos vie\u0161ajame pirkime technikai pirkti, derino komercinius pasi\u016blymus ir taip pa\u017eeid\u0117 Konkurencijos \u012fstatym\u0105. LVAT paskelb\u0117, kad Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas i\u0161samiai i\u0161tyr\u0117 bylos aplinkybes ir pri\u0117m\u0117 pagr\u012fst\u0105 sprendim\u0105, tod\u0117l atmet\u0117 bendrov\u0117s \u201eRovaltra\u201c &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":12450,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[27,32],"tags":[1247,267,438,180],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13969"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13969"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13969\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13974,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13969\/revisions\/13974"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12450"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}