{"id":11247,"date":"2019-01-17T09:38:54","date_gmt":"2019-01-17T06:38:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.teise.pro\/?p=11247"},"modified":"2019-01-17T09:41:19","modified_gmt":"2019-01-17T06:41:19","slug":"estt-lis-pendens-taisykliu-pazeidimas-nera-pakankamas-pagrindas-nepripazinti-teismo-sprendimo-pagal-briuselis-iibis-reglamenta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/2019\/01\/17\/estt-lis-pendens-taisykliu-pazeidimas-nera-pakankamas-pagrindas-nepripazinti-teismo-sprendimo-pagal-briuselis-iibis-reglamenta\/","title":{"rendered":"ESTT: lis pendens taisykli\u0173 pa\u017eeidimas n\u0117ra pakankamas pagrindas nepripa\u017einti teismo sprendimo pagal Briuselis IIbis reglament\u0105"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>ES Teisingumo Teismas (ESTT) sausio 16 d. pri\u0117m\u0117 <a href=\"http:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf;jsessionid=FD49D3F3460FCAFE8560302561E9F37E?text=&amp;docid=209849&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=LT&amp;mode=req&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=8802978\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">prejudicin\u012f sprendim\u0105<\/a> d\u0117l 2003\u00a0m. lapkri\u010dio 27\u00a0d. Tarybos Reglamento (EB) Nr.\u00a02201\/2003 d\u0117l jurisdikcijos ir teismo sprendim\u0173, susijusi\u0173 su santuoka ir t\u0117v\u0173 pareigomis, pripa\u017einimo bei vykdymo (kitaip dar vadinamo Briuselis IIbis reglamentu).<\/p>\n<p>Svarbu, kad ESTT i\u0161ai\u0161kino, kad\u00a0\u00a0<em>lis pendens<\/em> taisykli\u0173 pa\u017eeidimas n\u0117ra pakankamas pagrindas atsisakyti pripa\u017einti ES valstyb\u0117s nar\u0117s teismo sprendim\u0105, priimt\u0105 santuokos, t\u0117v\u0173 pareig\u0173 ir i\u0161laikymo prievoli\u0173 srityje, kaip prie\u0161taraujant\u012f valstyb\u0117s, kurioje sprendim\u0105 pra\u0161oma pripa\u017einti, vie\u0161ajai tvarkai.<\/p>\n<p>Pagal <em>lis pendens<\/em> taisykl\u0119, jeigu tarp t\u0173 pa\u010di\u0173 \u0161ali\u0173 skirting\u0173 valstybi\u0173 nari\u0173 teismuose i\u0161keliamos bylos d\u0117l santuokos nutraukimo, gyvenimo skyrium (separacija) ar santuokos pripa\u017einimo negaliojan\u010dia, teismas, kuriame buvo v\u0117liau i\u0161kelta byla, savo iniciatyva sustabdo nagrin\u0117jimo proces\u0105, kol nustatoma pirmojo teismo jurisdikcija. Jeigu nustatoma pirmojo teismo jurisdikcija, teismas, kuriame buvo v\u0117liau i\u0161kelta byla, atsisako jurisdikcijos pirmojo teismo naudai.<\/p>\n<p>ESTT pabr\u0117\u017e\u0117, kad teismo sprendimo nepripa\u017einimo d\u0117l jo akivaizdaus prie\u0161taravimo vie\u0161ajai tvarkai pagrindai turi b\u016bti ai\u0161kinami siaurai, nes jie kliudo \u012fgyvendinti vien\u0105 i\u0161 pagrindini\u0173 \u0161i\u0173 reglament\u0173 tiksl\u0173. Reglamentas pagr\u012fstas koncepcija, pagal kuri\u0105 valstyb\u0117je nar\u0117je priimt\u0173 sprendim\u0173 pripa\u017einimas ir vykdymas turi b\u016bti grind\u017eiamas abipusiu pasitik\u0117jimu, o nepripa\u017einimo pagrindai tur\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti minimal\u016bs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ES Teisingumo Teismas (ESTT) sausio 16 d. pri\u0117m\u0117 prejudicin\u012f sprendim\u0105 d\u0117l 2003\u00a0m. lapkri\u010dio 27\u00a0d. Tarybos Reglamento (EB) Nr.\u00a02201\/2003 d\u0117l jurisdikcijos ir teismo sprendim\u0173, susijusi\u0173 su santuoka ir t\u0117v\u0173 pareigomis, pripa\u017einimo bei vykdymo (kitaip dar vadinamo Briuselis IIbis reglamentu). Svarbu, kad ESTT i\u0161ai\u0161kino, kad\u00a0\u00a0lis pendens taisykli\u0173 pa\u017eeidimas n\u0117ra pakankamas pagrindas atsisakyti pripa\u017einti ES valstyb\u0117s nar\u0117s teismo &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":11248,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","duration":"","filesize":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","filesize_raw":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[1213,220,108,1315,312],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11247"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11247"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11247\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11251,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11247\/revisions\/11251"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11248"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11247"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11247"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.teise.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11247"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}